Theorem
(L'Hôpital's Rule for 0/0)
Assume

and

have derivatives

and

at each
point

of an open interval

and suppose that

and
Assume also that

for each

in

. If the limit
exists and has the value

, then the limit
also exists and has value

.
Note 1: This statement is for the indeterminate case 0/0. Using this
result can you get a corresponding result for the case of
? Try taking reciprocals of both
and
in that case.
Note 2: Also a similar result holds when the limit is two-sided (i.e.
instead of
), or the limit is at infinity
(i.e.
), or the limit value
is
.
Example (where L'Hôpital's rule works)
Find the value of
This quotient assumes the indeterminate form 0/0 as
. So we
can apply the L'Hôpital's rule:
Example (this example doesn't work exactly)
Find the value of
This quotient also assumes the form 0/0. So consider the quotient of the
derivatives:
This quotient still assumes the form 0/0, so we can continue applying
the L'Hôpital's rule, but it only gets worse... After

-steps, we
get to the quotient
The indeterminacy doesn't disappear.
Example (when students don't get enough sleep)
Find the value of
We have the form 0/0, so we apply L'Hôpital's rule:

NOT
CORRECT!
The first step is correct, and stop there. You don't have an
indeterminacy any more, so plug in

and get
Example
What happens if the limit

doesn't exist? Does that
mean the limit

does not exist?
Consider the example
Find limit of

:
This limit does not exist because

oscillates between -1 and 1. But
clearly if we rewrite the original limit, we find