Finding the potential function for path-independent vector
fields
You are given a vector field, say,
| F(x, y) = (y cos x + y2, sin x + 2xy - 2y). |
|
You calculate
 |
= (sin x + 2xy - 2y) = cos x + 2y |
|
 |
= (y cos x + y2) = cos x + 2y |
|
so that its curl is zero, i.e.,
- = 0. |
|
F is defined on all of
R2, so there are no
tricks to worry about.
The vector field
F is path-independent.
Since
F is path-independent, we know there exists some
potential function f so that
f = F. How do we go
about finding f?
Well,
f = F means that
 , = (F1, F2) = (y cos x + y2, sin x + 2xy - 2y). |
|
So we need to find a function f (x, y) that satisfies the two
conditions
(x, y) = y cos x + y2 |
(1) |
and
(x, y) = sin x + 2xy - 2y. |
(2) |
Let's take these conditions one by one and see if we can find an
f (x, y) that satisfies both of them. (We know this is possible since
F is path-independent. If
F were path-dependent, the
procedure that follows would hit a snag somewhere.)
Let's start with condition (1). We can take the equation
(x, y) = y cos x + y2, |
|
and treat y as though it were a number. In other words, we pretend
that the equation is
(x) = a cos x + a2 |
|
for some number a. We can integrate the equation with respect to
x and obtain that
| f (x) = a sin x + a2x + C. |
|
But, then we have to remember that a really was the variable y so
that
| f (x, y) = y sin x + y2x + C. |
|
But actually, that's not right yet either. Since we were viewing y
as a constant, really C could be a function of y and it wouldn't
make a difference. We can replace C with any function of y, say
g(y), and condition (1) will be satisfied
| f (x, y) = y sin x + y2x + g(y). |
(3) |
If you are still skeptical, try taking the partial derivative with
respect to x of f (x, y) defined by equation (3).
Since g(y) does not depend on x, we can conclude that
g(y) = 0. Indeed, condition
(1) is satisfied for the f (x, y) of equation
(3).
Now, we need to satisfy condition (2). We can take the
f (x, y) of equation (3) (so we know that condition
(1) will be satisfied) and take its partial derivative
with respect to y, obtaining
(x, y) =  y sin x + y2x + g(y) = sin x + 2yx + (y). |
|
Comparing this to condition (2), we are in luck. We can
easily make this f (x, y) satisfy condition (2) as long
as
(y) = - 2y. |
|
(If the vector field
F had been path-dependent, we would have
found it impossible to satisfy both condition (1) and
condition (2), and would have run into trouble at this
point.)
If we let
for some constant k, then
(x, y) = sin x + 2yx - 2y, |
|
and we have satisfied both conditions.
Combining this definition of g(y) with equation (3), we
conclude that the function
| f (x, y) = y sin x + y2x - y2 + k |
|
is a potential function for
F. You can verify that indeed
f = (y cos x + y2, sin x + 2xy - 2y) = F(x, y). |
|
With this in hand, calculating the integral
F . ds |
|
is simple, no matter what path C is. The integral is simply
f (q) - f (p), where
p is the beginning point and
q is the ending point of C. (For this reason, if C is a
closed curve, the integral is zero.)
We might like to give a problem such as find
F . ds |
|
where C is the curve given by the following graph.
The answer is simply
F . ds |
= f ( /2, -1) - f (- , 2) |
|
| |
= - sin /2 + -1 + k - (2 sin(- ) - 4 - 4 + k) |
|
| |
= - sin /2 + +3 = + 2 |
|
(The constant k is always guaranteed to cancel, so you could just
set k = 0.)
If the curve C is complicated, it's a good hint that
F is
probably path-independent. It's always a good idea to check
if
F is path-independent before computing its line integral
F . ds |
|
You might save yourself a lot of work.
Duane Nykamp
nykamp@math.umn.edu
2005-11-02