Finding the potential function for path-independent vector fields

You are given a vector field, say,

F(x,y) = (y cos x + y2, sin x + 2xy 2y).

You calculate

F2 x = x(sin x + 2xy 2y) = cos x + 2y F1 y = y(y cos x + y2) = cos x + 2y

so that its curl is zero, i.e.,

F2 x F1 y = 0.

F is defined on all of R2, so there are no tricks to worry about. The vector field F is path-independent.

Since F is path-independent, we know there exists some potential function f so that f = F. How do we go about finding f?

Well, f = F means that

f x, f y = (F1,F2) = (y cos x + y2, sin x + 2xy 2y).

So we need to find a function f(x,y) that satisfies the two conditions

f x(x,y) = y cos x + y2  (1)

and

f y(x,y) = sin x + 2xy 2y.  (2)

Let’s take these conditions one by one and see if we can find an f(x,y) that satisfies both of them. (We know this is possible since F is path-independent. If F were path-dependent, the procedure that follows would hit a snag somewhere.)

Let’s start with condition (1). We can take the equation

f x(x,y) = y cos x + y2,

and treat y as though it were a number. In other words, we pretend that the equation is

df dx(x) = a cos x + a2

for some number a. We can integrate the equation with respect to x and obtain that

f(x) = a sin x + a2x + C.

But, then we have to remember that a really was the variable y so that

f(x,y) = y sin x + y2x + C.

But actually, that’s not right yet either. Since we were viewing y as a constant, really C could be a function of y and it wouldn’t make a difference. We can replace C with any function of y, say g(y), and condition (1) will be satisfied

f(x,y) = y sin x + y2x + g(y).  (3)

If you are still skeptical, try taking the partial derivative with respect to x of f(x,y) defined by equation (3). Since g(y) does not depend on x, we can conclude that xg(y) = 0. Indeed, condition (1) is satisfied for the f(x,y) of equation (3).

Now, we need to satisfy condition (2). We can take the f(x,y) of equation (3) (so we know that condition (1) will be satisfied) and take its partial derivative with respect to y, obtaining

f y(x,y) = y y sin x + y2x + g(y) = sin x + 2yx + dg dy(y).

Comparing this to condition (2), we are in luck. We can easily make this f(x,y) satisfy condition (2) as long as

dg dy(y) = 2y.

(If the vector field F had been path-dependent, we would have found it impossible to satisfy both condition (1) and condition (2), and would have run into trouble at this point.)

If we let

g(y) = y2 + k

for some constant k, then

f y(x,y) = sin x + 2yx 2y,

and we have satisfied both conditions.

Combining this definition of g(y) with equation (3), we conclude that the function

f(x,y) = y sin x + y2x y2 + k

is a potential function for F. You can verify that indeed

f = (y cos x + y2, sin x + 2xy 2y) = F(x,y).

With this in hand, calculating the integral

CF ds

is simple, no matter what path C is. The integral is simply f(q) f(p), where p is the beginning point and q is the ending point of C. (For this reason, if C is a closed curve, the integral is zero.)

We might like to give a problem such as find

CF ds

where C is the curve given by the following graph.

PIC

The answer is simply

CF ds = f(π2,1) f(π, 2) = sin π2 + π 2 1 + k (2 sin(π) 4π 4 + k) = sin π2 + 9π 2 + 3 = 9π 2 + 2

(The constant k is always guaranteed to cancel, so you could just set k = 0.)

If the curve C is complicated, it’s a good hint that F is probably path-independent. It’s always a good idea to check if F is path-independent before computing its line integral

CF ds

You might save yourself a lot of work.