Other ways of writing Green’s theorem

In the introductory reading on Green’s theorem, we wrote Green’s theorem as

CF ds = ∫ ∫D(curl F) kdA
or
CF ds = ∫ ∫D(           )
 ∂F2-   ∂F1-
  ∂x  -  ∂ydA,
where F(x,y) = (F1(x,y),F2(x,y)) is a two-dimensional vector field, D is a region in plane, and C is its positively oriented boundary. I used this notation to tie Green’s theorem in with the concept of the curl of a vector field.

We often denote C by ∂D to make it explicit that the curve C is the (positively oriented) boundary of D. This notation is also more natural when the region D has more than one boundary component. Then, Green’s theorem can look like, for example,

∂DF ds = ∫ ∫D(            )
  ∂F2--  ∂F1-
  ∂x     ∂ydA,
Note that the notation ∂D simply means the boundary of D. It has nothing to do with a partial derivative.

However, people frequently write Green’s theorem differently. First, they like to change the formula by writing the line integral at the left in terms of components:

∂DF1dx + F2dy = ∫ ∫D( ∂F     ∂F  )
  ---2-  ---1
  ∂x     ∂ydA.
Then, they like to let the vector field be F(x,y) = (P(x,y),Q(x,y)), so that Green’s theorem becomes
∂DPdx + Qdy = ∫ ∫D(           )
  ∂Q--   ∂P--
   ∂x -  ∂ydA.

Sometimes, F = (P,Q) won’t be referred to as a vector field. Instead, one can discuss the above version of Green’s theorem as applied to the two scalar valued functions Q : D R and P : D R.